Serveur d'exploration H2N2

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Two Influenza A Virus-Specific Fabs Neutralize by Inhibiting Virus Attachment to Target Cells, While Neutralization by Their IgGs Is Complex and Occurs Simultaneously through Fusion Inhibition and Attachment Inhibition

Identifieur interne : 000140 ( 1968/Analysis ); précédent : 000139; suivant : 000141

Two Influenza A Virus-Specific Fabs Neutralize by Inhibiting Virus Attachment to Target Cells, While Neutralization by Their IgGs Is Complex and Occurs Simultaneously through Fusion Inhibition and Attachment Inhibition

Auteurs : M. J. Edwards [Royaume-Uni] ; N. J. Dimmock [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:1AEBEC4A096C908436AE669C5225D8BC0E765AE8

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: Mabs H36 (IgG2a) and H37 (IgG3) recognize epitopes in antigenic sites Sb and Ca2, respectively, in the HA1 subunit of influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (H1N1). Their neutralization was complex. Our aim here was to investigate the mechanism of neutralization by the IgGs and their Fabs. In MDCK and BHK cells, both IgGs neutralized primarily by inhibiting virus–cell fusion, although at higher IgG concentrations virus attachment to target cells was also inhibited. In contrast, the Fabs neutralized entirely by inhibiting virus attachment, although a higher concentration of Fab than IgG was required to bring this about. Both H36 and H37 exerted a concentration-dependent spectrum of neutralization activity, with virus–cell fusion inhibition and virus–cell attachment inhibition being the predominant mechanisms at low- and high-antibody concentration, respectively, and both mechanisms occurring simultaneously at intermediate concentrations. However, it may be that attachment inhibition was a secondary event, occurring to virus that had already been neutralized through inhibition of its fusion activity. Neutralization by H36 and H37 Fabs was a simple process. Both inhibited virus attachment but required much higher (>100-fold) molar concentrations for activity than did IgG. The functional affinities of the IgGs were high (0.4–0.6 nM) and differences between these and the affinity of their Fabs (H36, nil; H37, 23-fold) were not sufficient to explain the differences observed in neutralization. Similar neutralization data were obtained in two different cell lines. The dose–response curve for neutralization by H36 F(ab′)2 resembled that for IgG, although eightfold more F(ab′)2 was required for 50% neutralization. Overall, neutralization mechanisms of H36 and H37 antibodies were similar, and thus independent of antigenic site, antibody isotype, and target cell.

Url:
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2000.0631


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:1AEBEC4A096C908436AE669C5225D8BC0E765AE8

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Two Influenza A Virus-Specific Fabs Neutralize by Inhibiting Virus Attachment to Target Cells, While Neutralization by Their IgGs Is Complex and Occurs Simultaneously through Fusion Inhibition and Attachment Inhibition</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Edwards, M J" sort="Edwards, M J" uniqKey="Edwards M" first="M. J." last="Edwards">M. J. Edwards</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dimmock, N J" sort="Dimmock, N J" uniqKey="Dimmock N" first="N. J." last="Dimmock">N. J. Dimmock</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1AEBEC4A096C908436AE669C5225D8BC0E765AE8</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1006/viro.2000.0631</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-ST2T208D-K/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001803</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001803</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001803</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0042-6822:2000:Edwards M:two:influenza:a</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001968</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001925</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001925</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/1968/Extraction">000140</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Two Influenza A Virus-Specific Fabs Neutralize by Inhibiting Virus Attachment to Target Cells, While Neutralization by Their IgGs Is Complex and Occurs Simultaneously through Fusion Inhibition and Attachment Inhibition</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Edwards, M J" sort="Edwards, M J" uniqKey="Edwards M" first="M. J." last="Edwards">M. J. Edwards</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>CV4 7AL</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dimmock, N J" sort="Dimmock, N J" uniqKey="Dimmock N" first="N. J." last="Dimmock">N. J. Dimmock</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>CV4 7AL</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Virology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YVIRO</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-6822</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2000">2000</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">278</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="423">423</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="435">435</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-6822</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-6822</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>F(ab′)2</term>
<term>Fab</term>
<term>IgG</term>
<term>affinity</term>
<term>influenza A virus</term>
<term>inhibition of attachment</term>
<term>inhibition of fusion</term>
<term>inhibition of internalization</term>
<term>mechanism of neutralization</term>
<term>neutralization</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Academic press</term>
<term>Antibody concentration</term>
<term>Antibody fragments</term>
<term>Antibody isotype</term>
<term>Antigenic</term>
<term>Antigenic site</term>
<term>Antigenic sites</term>
<term>Assay</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment inhibition</term>
<term>Biol</term>
<term>Cell biol</term>
<term>Cold dmem</term>
<term>Colloidal coomassie</term>
<term>Dimmock</term>
<term>Dmem</term>
<term>Elisa</term>
<term>Epitope</term>
<term>Fabs</term>
<term>Fluorescence dequenching</term>
<term>Functional affinities</term>
<term>Fusion</term>
<term>Fusion activity</term>
<term>Fusion inhibition</term>
<term>Fusion process</term>
<term>Gerhard</term>
<term>Gibco</term>
<term>Higher concentration</term>
<term>Igg</term>
<term>Igg2a</term>
<term>Igg3</term>
<term>Infectivity</term>
<term>Influenza</term>
<term>Influenza virus</term>
<term>Inhibition</term>
<term>Internalization</term>
<term>Mabs</term>
<term>Mdck</term>
<term>Mdck cells</term>
<term>Monolayers</term>
<term>Neuraminidase</term>
<term>Neutralization</term>
<term>Neutralization activity</term>
<term>Neutralizing</term>
<term>Nonlinear regression analysis</term>
<term>Partial inhibition</term>
<term>Percentage attachment</term>
<term>Percentage infectivity</term>
<term>Receptor</term>
<term>Same batch</term>
<term>Same mixtures</term>
<term>Same system</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Schofield</term>
<term>Sigma</term>
<term>Similar data</term>
<term>Simple neutralization</term>
<term>Surface plasmon resonance</term>
<term>Target cell</term>
<term>Target cells</term>
<term>Virion</term>
<term>Virol</term>
<term>Virology</term>
<term>Virus</term>
<term>Virus attachment</term>
<term>Virus control</term>
<term>Virus controls</term>
<term>Virus fusion</term>
<term>Virus internalization</term>
<term>Warm dmem</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Mabs H36 (IgG2a) and H37 (IgG3) recognize epitopes in antigenic sites Sb and Ca2, respectively, in the HA1 subunit of influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (H1N1). Their neutralization was complex. Our aim here was to investigate the mechanism of neutralization by the IgGs and their Fabs. In MDCK and BHK cells, both IgGs neutralized primarily by inhibiting virus–cell fusion, although at higher IgG concentrations virus attachment to target cells was also inhibited. In contrast, the Fabs neutralized entirely by inhibiting virus attachment, although a higher concentration of Fab than IgG was required to bring this about. Both H36 and H37 exerted a concentration-dependent spectrum of neutralization activity, with virus–cell fusion inhibition and virus–cell attachment inhibition being the predominant mechanisms at low- and high-antibody concentration, respectively, and both mechanisms occurring simultaneously at intermediate concentrations. However, it may be that attachment inhibition was a secondary event, occurring to virus that had already been neutralized through inhibition of its fusion activity. Neutralization by H36 and H37 Fabs was a simple process. Both inhibited virus attachment but required much higher (>100-fold) molar concentrations for activity than did IgG. The functional affinities of the IgGs were high (0.4–0.6 nM) and differences between these and the affinity of their Fabs (H36, nil; H37, 23-fold) were not sufficient to explain the differences observed in neutralization. Similar neutralization data were obtained in two different cell lines. The dose–response curve for neutralization by H36 F(ab′)2 resembled that for IgG, although eightfold more F(ab′)2 was required for 50% neutralization. Overall, neutralization mechanisms of H36 and H37 antibodies were similar, and thus independent of antigenic site, antibody isotype, and target cell.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Edwards, M J" sort="Edwards, M J" uniqKey="Edwards M" first="M. J." last="Edwards">M. J. Edwards</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Dimmock, N J" sort="Dimmock, N J" uniqKey="Dimmock N" first="N. J." last="Dimmock">N. J. Dimmock</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/H2N2V1/Data/1968/Analysis
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000140 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/1968/Analysis/biblio.hfd -nk 000140 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    H2N2V1
   |flux=    1968
   |étape=   Analysis
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:1AEBEC4A096C908436AE669C5225D8BC0E765AE8
   |texte=   Two Influenza A Virus-Specific Fabs Neutralize by Inhibiting Virus Attachment to Target Cells, While Neutralization by Their IgGs Is Complex and Occurs Simultaneously through Fusion Inhibition and Attachment Inhibition
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 14 19:59:40 2020. Site generation: Thu Mar 25 15:38:26 2021